Cubiks Practice Test Strategy

SEO title: Cubiks Practice Strategy: A Two-Week Plan

Meta description: A block-by-block Cubiks (Talogy) practice plan: identify your Logiks version, diagnose verbal, numerical and abstract separately, then rehearse the timers.

Suggested URL: /tests/cubiks-practice-test-strategy

Quick answer

A Cubiks practice plan should be built around blocks, because that is how the assessment is built. Logiks General puts verbal, numerical and abstract reasoning in one sitting, but each carries its own countdown, so what you are really preparing for is three short performances back to back rather than one long test. Practising a general pace and hoping it transfers is the most common way candidates waste a fortnight.

The plan below therefore starts with identification, not practice. Establish which Logiks version you have been assigned — Intermediate and Advanced behave very differently, and standalone single-ability Logiks Advanced tests are different again — then run a short diagnostic in each block, then weight your drilling towards whichever block came out worst. For most candidates that turns out to be abstract, because it carries the shortest allocation and the material is the least familiar.

Two things are worth settling before you begin. Check whether a calculator is permitted, since practising under the wrong condition makes you slower on the day. And treat published question counts and timings as indicative rather than exact: the commonly cited configurations are 50 questions in 12 minutes for Logiks General Intermediate and 30 in 20 for Advanced, but employers configure their own and the instruction screen on the day is the only authoritative source. You may see either the Cubiks or Talogy name during all of this — Cubiks came under the Talogy brand on 15 March 2022, and the material is the same.

Days 1–2: Establish which Logiks you are sitting

Open your invitation properly before doing anything else. It normally names the assessment, gives an expected duration, states the completion deadline, and sometimes says whether the sitting is supervised.

The distinction that matters most is Intermediate versus Advanced, because the rhythm differs completely. The commonly published Intermediate configuration puts 50 questions into 12 minutes, which works out at only a few seconds per item and rewards fast recognition above all. The commonly published Advanced configuration puts 30 questions into 20 minutes, typically described as around eight minutes each for verbal and numerical and four for abstract — noticeably more time per question, and harder questions to spend it on. Preparing for one and sitting the other means arriving with the wrong instincts.

Check too whether you have been assigned a standalone single-ability Logiks Advanced test rather than Logiks General. These are commonly reported at around 25 minutes for verbal, 25 for numerical and 15 for abstract, and they are one sustained test on a single ability rather than three short blocks. The stamina requirement is different and so is the pacing plan.

Finally, note whether a PAPI personality questionnaire or a situational judgement component is also assigned. Neither is something you drill, but both take real time on the day and should be in your schedule.

Days 3–4: One timed diagnostic per block

Run a short timed set in each reasoning block under realistic conditions, then spend longer analysing than you spent answering.

Capture four things per block: how far you got, whether you left items unanswered, which question types felt slow, and where your errors actually came from. Then read them separately, because the diagnoses differ by block in ways that matter.

In numerical, separate reading errors from arithmetic errors. Misidentifying units, using the wrong column or period, or solving for a different quantity from the one asked are reading errors — far more common than arithmetic weakness, and much faster to fix.

In verbal, look at how you handled items where the passage did not settle the question. Candidates who found themselves reasoning from background knowledge, or from a plausible assumption the text never made, have a discipline problem rather than a comprehension one.

In abstract, the diagnostic question is simply whether you had a method. If you were staring at sequences waiting for the rule to surface, that alone explains most of the gap, and it is the single most fixable thing in this plan.

Whichever block came out weakest gets the majority of the days that follow. With a fortnight available, spreading effort evenly across three blocks is a worse use of time than fixing the one that is actually costing you.

Days 5–9: Drill each block on its own terms

Work one block at a time, in short timed sets of ten to fifteen items, then review every item — including the ones you got right, because you are looking for the shortest route rather than confirmation.

For abstract, build a fixed checklist and run it on every single item until it is automatic: rotation, reflection, number of elements, shading, size, position within the frame, then whether two rules alternate between successive figures. That last check is the one candidates most often skip and it unlocks a disproportionate share of the harder items. Because the abstract allocation is typically the shortest block in Logiks General, speed here converts directly into marks.

For numerical, build the orientation habit — units, categories, periods, footnotes checked before any calculation — and drill the recurring operations: percentage change, ratios, unit rates, proportional scaling, averages. Practise estimating when answer options are widely spread. Practise with or without a calculator strictly according to what your invitation permits.

For verbal, drill the discipline of judging statements only against the passage. Read the statement first, then scan for the sentence it depends on. Watch quantifiers, since turning "some" into "all" or "may" into "will" is the block's favourite distractor. If your version includes word relationships, analogies or vocabulary items, drill those separately, since they are a recognition task rather than a reading task and reward a different rhythm.

If PAPI is assigned, do not drill it. Read one description of how normative and ipsative formats work so the forced-choice structure is not a surprise, and plan to answer honestly and at a steady pace.

Days 10–12: Rehearse the block transitions, not just the blocks

This is the stage most candidates skip, and it is where Logiks preparation differs from preparation for a single-timer test.

Run the blocks back to back, in sequence, timed, in the environment you will actually use. What you are rehearsing is not the questions but the switch: moving from a data-heavy numerical block straight into figural pattern work costs a beat of reorientation, and doing it cold on the day costs you questions in a block that may only run four minutes.

Rehearse the fact that time does not carry across. Deliberately finish a block early in practice and notice that the next block starts fresh with its own clock. Candidates who have not internalised this either rush a block they had time in, or spend a block hunting for a buffer that does not exist.

Set your per-block pacing rules during these rehearsals rather than on the day. Calculate the budget for each block from the numbers you expect, hold it, and set one mid-block checkpoint rather than watching the countdown. Decide an abandonment threshold per block — and note that it differs sharply between them. In a block running at a few seconds per item, thirty seconds on one question is a disaster. In the Advanced numerical block at roughly a minute per question, the same thirty seconds is simply working.

Analyse each rehearsal the way you analysed the diagnostic, looking for movement in the specific thing you drilled rather than in the overall total.

Days 13–14: Taper and set up

Stop heavy practice. One light set per block on the final day keeps you warm; cramming degrades exactly the speed and accuracy the test measures.

Handle logistics instead. Confirm the completion deadline and check your spam folder, since assessment invitations are filtered routinely and windows elapse unnoticed. Sort the environment: wired connection or close to the router, other applications closed, notifications silenced on both computer and phone, water and any permitted paper and calculator on the desk, and anyone sharing your space told exactly when the window is. On a four-minute block, a thirty-second interruption is several questions.

Read the instruction screen in full before each block rather than skimming it. You are checking the question count and time limit for that specific block, whether you can return to a skipped item, and whether a calculator is permitted. Any unscored example items exist so you can confirm the interface behaves as you expect.

Sit it when you are alert, with a clear block of time around the whole thing — and remember that if PAPI is included, the session runs considerably longer than the Logiks timings alone suggest. Afterwards, spend ten minutes noting which blocks felt slow and which item types caused trouble, because that note is where your next preparation starts.

What not to spend the fortnight on

Because the assessment is modular and short, the wrong preparation is unusually costly — every hour on the wrong thing is an hour not spent on the block that is actually weak.

Do not prepare for the whole Cubiks catalogue. Logiks General, standalone Logiks Advanced tests, PAPI and situational judgement components are assigned selectively by role, and no candidate sits all of it.

Do not try to memorise question banks. Forms vary and specific items rarely recur. What transfers is method — orienting to an exhibit before calculating, judging statements strictly against a passage, running a feature checklist on a shape sequence.

Do not rehearse PAPI answers. Forced-choice formats are designed to make an idealised profile hard to construct, and a strained answer set tends to look exactly like one.

Do not build your pacing plan on figures from a third-party guide. Published numbers differ between sources and employers configure their own; use the instruction screen.

And do not do most of your practice untimed. Untimed accuracy tells you very little about performance in a block measured in seconds per question, and it is the most common reason candidates are surprised on the day.

How TestSolve can help

TestSolve lets candidates practise realistic question types, see worked explanations, and review their mistakes before a real online assessment. In this plan it does the work of days 3 to 12: drilling Logiks-style verbal, numerical and abstract blocks separately under time pressure, then reading a worked explanation for each item rather than only checking the answer.

The explanations are what turn practice into speed, because they show the route the question was designed around — which figure in an exhibit the answer depended on, why a statement overstates its passage, which feature check unlocks a shape sequence. And because the mistake review is grouped by block, it tells you where the remaining days should go rather than leaving you to distribute effort evenly across three blocks that do not need it equally.

Frequently asked questions

TestSolve is independent and not affiliated with any test provider or employer named on this page. All product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners.